IDO
Classic Launchpads
If we consider IDO Launchpads as competitors and focus on the IDO market size, then at the current stage, ALL Launchpads except DAOMaker are unprofitable. This is not taking into account the entry cost to the Launchpad
The cons of Launchpads today can be highlighted as follows:
Exclusive public rounds, with rare exceptions of private sales
Large unlocks of public rounds (15-50% at TGE), leading to token dumps and 2-3x price drops
High entry threshold in Launchpad tokens
Difficulty of participation for newcomers
Limited project descriptions and lack of research
First come, first served purchase system (FCFS)
Allocation distribution among large token holders, resulting in small allocations for small investors
Long wait times for sales to start
Complex stage system from start to first profit
Lack of manuals, assistance, or support
What are the key differences of our platform from IDO Launchpads?
We do not limit ourselves to public rounds, but focus on Seed and Private rounds, and possibly Early Stage.
Investors, who join at this stage - invest in long terms according to vesting
We have no entry threshold in tokens. All investments take place with a platform commission
Simple participation for users with any level of knowledge
Full project description, information aggregation, and research with a rating system
No FCFS system and application of our own participation mechanics
Possibility to participate before the start of sales and notification at all stages
Our own allocation distribution principles that exclude the FCFS model
Simple participation system with only a few stages
User training, prompts, and information about any element of the platform, integrated Academy, and knowledge library
The following table compares launchpads and all the key indicators
Last updated