IDO

Classic Launchpads

If we consider IDO Launchpads as competitors and focus on the IDO market size, then at the current stage, ALL Launchpads except DAOMaker are unprofitable. This is not taking into account the entry cost to the Launchpad

The cons of Launchpads today can be highlighted as follows:

  1. Exclusive public rounds, with rare exceptions of private sales

  2. Large unlocks of public rounds (15-50% at TGE), leading to token dumps and 2-3x price drops

  3. High entry threshold in Launchpad tokens

  4. Difficulty of participation for newcomers

  5. Limited project descriptions and lack of research

  6. First come, first served purchase system (FCFS)

  7. Allocation distribution among large token holders, resulting in small allocations for small investors

  8. Long wait times for sales to start

  9. Complex stage system from start to first profit

  10. Lack of manuals, assistance, or support

What are the key differences of our platform from IDO Launchpads?

  1. We do not limit ourselves to public rounds, but focus on Seed and Private rounds, and possibly Early Stage.

  2. Investors, who join at this stage - invest in long terms according to vesting

  3. We have no entry threshold in tokens. All investments take place with a platform commission

  4. Simple participation for users with any level of knowledge

  5. Full project description, information aggregation, and research with a rating system

  6. No FCFS system and application of our own participation mechanics

  7. Possibility to participate before the start of sales and notification at all stages

  8. Our own allocation distribution principles that exclude the FCFS model

  9. Simple participation system with only a few stages

  10. User training, prompts, and information about any element of the platform, integrated Academy, and knowledge library

The following table compares launchpads and all the key indicators

Last updated